Explore the polling

Every question, with its verbatim wording, its toplines, and a link to the pollster’s own release. Filters combine; the address updates so any view can be shared.

Clear

1,931 questions from 644 polls

GallupContact & populationJan 2020 – Dec 31, 2020
self-identification as transgender

Which of the following do you consider yourself to be? You can select as many as apply: Straight or heterosexual; Lesbian; Gay; Bisexual; Transgender.

Transgender
0.6%
Sample
15,349 adults · ±1 percentage point
Method
probability RDD
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 6 subgroup figures

Base: 692 LGBT adults, MOE ±5 percentage points

Wording notes: mixes sexual orientation and gender identity in one select-all list, so a trans respondent must choose 'transgender' alongside or instead of an orientationasked as a demographic item at the end of Gallup telephone surveysno nonbinary option in this wave
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Straight or heterosexual
  • Lesbian
  • Gay
  • Bisexual
  • Transgender
  • Other
  • No opinion / refused
The Trevor ProjectSurveys of trans peopleparaphrasedDec 2, 2019 – Mar 31, 2020
suicide consideration and anxiety symptoms by gender identity

40% of LGBTQ respondents seriously considered attempting suicide in the past twelve months, with more than half of transgender and nonbinary youth having seriously considered suicide. 68% of LGBTQ youth reported symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder in the past two weeks, including more than 3 in 4 transgender and nonbinary youth.

Symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder in the past two weeks
68%
Engaged in self-harm in the past 12 months
48%
Seriously considered attempting suicide in the past 12 months
40%
Sample
40,001 LGBTQ young people ages 13-24 - nonprobability social-media-recruited sample, NOT a poll of the general public · not applicable - nonprobability sample
Method
nonprobability quota
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record

Base: 60,795 youth from unique IP addresses consented; 210 lived outside the U.S., 551 were outside the 13-24 range, 6,412 did not meet targeted-recruitment demographic characteristics, 13,343 did not reach the survey midpoint, 205 were not LGBTQ and 73 were mischievous responders, leaving 40,001.

Wording notes: the trans/nonbinary figures are reported only as fractions ('more than half', 'more than 3 in 4') in the introduction
Cooperative Election Study (CES)Military serviceNov 6, 2019 – Dec 8, 2019
CCES variable CC19_332e - ban transgender people in the military

For each of the following tell us whether you support or oppose these decisions.

Ban Transgender People in the Military

Support 38%62% Oppose
Sample
18,000 adults
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national (large enough for state-level estimates)
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 6 subgroup figures

Base: Off-year CES: a single post-election common-content wave

Wording notes: bare policy labelno middle or don't-know optionembedded in an executive-orders battery
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
Cooperative Election Study (CES)Contact & populationNov 6, 2019 – Dec 8, 2019
CES demographic variable measuring transgender status of the respondent

Have you ever undergone any part of a process (including any thought or action) to change your gender / perceived gender from the one you were assigned at birth? This may include steps such as changing the type of clothes you wear, name you are known by or undergoing surgery.

No
93.5%
Yes
3.9%
Prefer not to say
2.6%
Sample
18,000 adults
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national (large enough for state-level estimates)
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Off-year CES: a single post-election common-content wave

Wording notes: extremely broad wording ('any thought or action')
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
GLAADfor GLAADMilitary serviceNov 2019 – Dec 31, 2019
belief about whether banning trans military service is currently legal, and whether it should be illegal

% of Americans who feel the situation is currently illegal under federal law in the U.S. / % of non-LGBTQ Americans who believe the situation should be illegal under federal law in U.S.

Ban physically qualified transgender people from serving in the U.S. military

Sample
asked of a subset: LGBTQ, Non-LGBTQfull poll: 2,506 adults · not applicable - not a probability sample
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: results are reported separately for non-LGBTQ and LGBTQ respondents; subsample sizes not published

Wording notes: the qualifier 'physically qualified' is built into the item and pre-empts the fitness-for-duty objectionasks about legality rather than personal support, so it is a knowledge item as well as an attitude item
GLAADfor GLAADBathrooms & facilitiesNov 2019 – Dec 31, 2019
belief about whether denying restroom access matching gender identity is currently legal, and whether it should be illegal

% of Americans who feel the situation is currently illegal under federal law in the U.S. / % of non-LGBTQ Americans who believe the situation should be illegal under federal law in U.S.

Deny transgender people the right to use the restroom that aligns with their gender identity

Sample
asked of a subset: LGBTQ, Non-LGBTQfull poll: 2,506 adults · not applicable - not a probability sample
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: results are reported separately for non-LGBTQ and LGBTQ respondents; subsample sizes not published

Wording notes: frames restroom access as 'the right to use the restroom that aligns with their gender identity'
GLAADfor GLAADIdentity beliefsparaphrasedNov 2019 – Dec 31, 2019
prior-year (2020 column) values for the 'only two genders' and 'trans/nonbinary will become familiar' items

There are only two genders. / Nonbinary and transgender people will become a more familiar part of life just as gays and lesbians have.

Sample
asked of a subset: Non-LGBTQ (2020 column)full poll: 2,506 adults · not applicable - not a probability sample
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 2 subgroup figures

Base: results are reported separately for non-LGBTQ and LGBTQ respondents; subsample sizes not published

Wording notes: only the disagree net was published for the 'two genders' item
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
Rasmussen ReportsSportsOct 31, 2019 – Nov 2, 2019
trans students on teams matching gender identity

Do you favor or oppose allowing transgender students to participate on the sports teams of the gender they identify with, letting biological males, for example, play girls' sports?

Favor 29%51% Oppose
Sample
1,000 adults · +/- 3 percentage points
Method
IVR
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: the stem appends an interpretive clause - 'letting biological males, for example, play girls' sports' - which recharacterizes the policy before the respondent answers'biological males' used to denote trans girls
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
  • Not sure
IpsosIdentity beliefsOct 17–18, 2019
men's reactions to the public conversation about non-binary gender - threat, exclusion, anger, learning

There is a national discussion going on about whether there are not just two genders (male and female) but if there are a spectrum of genders in between.

There is a national discussion going on about whether there are not just two genders (male and female) but if there are a spectrum of genders in between. How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements regarding this conversation?

Sample
asked of a subset: Men - Hearing the conversation usually makes me annoyed or angry, Men - I feel excluded from that conversation, Men - I feel included in that conversation, Men - I feel like my values are being threatenedfull poll: 1,005 men (adult men 18+); the trans-relevant battery was asked only of male respondents · Credibility interval of +/- 3.5 percentage points for all respondents; design-effect adjusted confidence interval +/- 5.0 points (n=1,005, DEFF=1.5). Ipsos does not publish a separate interval for the male subsample; at N=414 it would be materially wider.
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 18 subgroup figures

Base: Full poll N=1,005 adults 18+; the 'spectrum of genders' battery recorded here was asked only of male respondents (N=414). All percentages below are among men.

Wording notes: asked only of men - the design deliberately isolates male reaction rather than reporting a gender crosstabthe preamble presents the existence of the debate as fact without taking a side, but framing it as a 'national discussion' about 'whether' there are more than two genders does put the question of trans and non-binary existence up for public adjudicationthe nine sub-items are asymmetric in valence: five are negative (attacked, annoyed/angry, values threatened, excluded, rights taken away, against religious beliefs), two positive (learned a lot, feel included), one neutral-positive (men have an important role)no 'don't know' offered; large 'neither agree nor disagree' shares (21-43%)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Neither agree nor disagree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
YouGovfor The EconomistGeneral acceptanceOct 6–8, 2019
perceived level of discrimination faced by transgender people

Level of discrimination -- Transgender people

How much discrimination do the following people face in America today?

A great deal
39%
A fair amount
30%
Not much
20%
None at all
11%
Sample
1,500 adults · ±2.9% (adjusted for weighting)
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 12 subgroup figures

Base: Q34 and Q36 were each asked of a randomized half sample (n about 750).

Wording notes: battery item
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • A great deal
  • A fair amount
  • Not much
  • None at all
YouGovfor The EconomistMilitary serviceOct 6–8, 2019
allowing transgender people to serve in the military

Do you support or oppose allowing transgender people to serve in the military?

Support 49%31% Oppose
Sample
1,500 adults · ±2.9% (adjusted for weighting)
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 9 subgroup figures

Base: Q34 and Q36 were each asked of a randomized half sample (n about 750).

Wording notes: drops 'openly' relative to the 2017-2018 version, so it is a different item
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
  • Not sure
YouGovfor The EconomistNondiscriminationOct 6–8, 2019
federal employment nondiscrimination law

Do you support or oppose a law that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment based on sexual orientation or gender identity?

Support 51%27% Oppose
Sample
1,500 adults · ±2.9% (adjusted for weighting)
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 9 subgroup figures

Base: Q34 and Q36 were each asked of a randomized half sample (n about 750).

Wording notes: bundles sexual orientation and gender identity in one item, so it does not isolate transgender protectionsfielded the week the Supreme Court heard Harris Funeral Homes / Bostock
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Support
  • Oppose
  • Not sure
YouGovfor The EconomistBathrooms & facilitiesOct 6–8, 2019
which bathroom transgender people should use

Do you think transgender people should use the bathrooms that correspond with their birth gender or with their current gender identity?

Birth gender
39%
Current gender identity
36%
Not sure
25%
Sample
1,500 adults · ±2.9% (adjusted for weighting)
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 9 subgroup figures

Base: Q34 and Q36 were each asked of a randomized half sample (n about 750).

Wording notes: uses 'birth gender' here; later fieldings of the same tracker say 'assigned sex at birth'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Birth gender
  • Current gender identity
  • Not sure
YouGovfor The EconomistBathrooms & facilitiesOct 6–8, 2019
personal discomfort seeing a transgender man in a men's restroom

Asked of half of respondents

Would it make you feel uncomfortable if you saw someone who identifies as male, but you know was born female, enter and use the men's restroom?

Yes, I would feel uncomfortable
44%
No, it would not matter
44%
Prefer not to say
12%
Sample
1,500 adults · ±2.9% (adjusted for weighting)
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 9 subgroup figures

Base: Q34 and Q36 were each asked of a randomized half sample (n about 750).

Wording notes: split-half pair with the trans-woman version (Q36)describes the person as 'someone who identifies as male, but you know was born female' rather than as a transgender manmeasures personal discomfort rather than policy preference
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes, I would feel uncomfortable
  • No, it would not matter
  • Prefer not to say
YouGovfor The EconomistBathrooms & facilitiesOct 6–8, 2019
personal discomfort seeing a transgender woman in a women's restroom

Asked of half of respondents

Would it make you feel uncomfortable if you saw someone who identifies as female, but you know was born male, enter and use the women's restroom?

Yes, I would feel uncomfortable
49%
No, it would not matter
41%
Prefer not to say
10%
Sample
1,500 adults · ±2.9% (adjusted for weighting)
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record

Base: Q34 and Q36 were each asked of a randomized half sample (n about 750).

Wording notes: split-half pair with the trans-man version (Q34)party crosstab not extracted
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes, I would feel uncomfortable
  • No, it would not matter
  • Prefer not to say
YouGovfor The EconomistPronouns & languageOct 6–8, 2019
firing a teacher for refusing a student's pronouns

Do you approve or disapprove of firing a teacher for refusing to use a transgender student's new pronouns?

Approve 27%49% Disapprove
Sample
1,500 adults · ±2.9% (adjusted for weighting)
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)PDF, external
Full record · 15 subgroup figures

Base: Q34 and Q36 were each asked of a randomized half sample (n about 750).

Wording notes: asks about the sanction (firing) rather than about the underlying pronoun policy, which is a much harder testprompted by a specific Virginia news story asked about in the preceding item
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly approve
  • Somewhat approve
  • Somewhat disapprove
  • Strongly disapprove
  • Not sure
IpsosContact & populationdata flagOct 4–7, 2019
knowing a transgender person, by relationship type

Do you know someone in your life who is...?

Do you know someone in your life who is...? Transgender

No
51%
Yes, an acquaintance
16%
Yes, a friend
9%
Yes, a coworker
5%
Yes, in my extended family
2%
Yes, in my immediate family
1%
Yes, a neighbor
1%
Not sure
12%
Refused
10%
Sample
1,306 adults; includes an LGBT boost sample · As published: 'plus or minus 1.8 percentage points at the 95% confidence level' for the general-population sample of adults, with a stated design effect of 1.12. NOTE: +/- 1.8 points is implausibly tight for n=1,021 (roughly +/- 3.2 would be expected at DEFF 1.12); the figure is recorded exactly as Ipsos published it and should be treated as a probable error in the source document.
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Nationally representative probability sample of adults 18+ (N=1,021) PLUS an LGBT boost sample (N=285), for a combined total of 1,306. IMPORTANT: the topline tables for the items below print '(N=1,306)', i.e. the combined base including the boost. Ipsos weighted the general-population sample and the LGBT boost separately, each raked to the 18+ adult population, but the release does not state how the two were combined for the published totals. Percentages on the contact and gender-belief items should therefore NOT be read as clean general-population estimates.

Wording notes: response set distinguishes closeness of relationship rather than collapsing to a yes/no, which is a genuine design strengthincludes 'Yes, I am' so self-identification is captured in the same item10% refused and 12% were not sure - high enough that the 'No' share is not a clean complementpublished base appears to include the LGBT boost sample
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes, I am
  • Yes, in my immediate family
  • Yes, in my extended family
  • Yes, a friend
  • Yes, a coworker
  • Yes, a neighbor
  • Yes, an acquaintance
  • No
  • Not sure
  • Refused
IpsosContact & populationdata flagOct 4–7, 2019
knowing a non-binary or gender non-conforming person

Do you know someone in your life who is...?

Do you know someone in your life who is...? Non-binary/Non-conforming

No
49%
Yes, an acquaintance
8%
Yes, a friend
4%
Yes, a coworker
2%
Yes, I am
1%
Yes, in my immediate family
1%
Yes, in my extended family
1%
Yes, a neighbor
1%
Not sure
27%
Refused
10%
Sample
1,306 adults; includes an LGBT boost sample · As published: 'plus or minus 1.8 percentage points at the 95% confidence level' for the general-population sample of adults, with a stated design effect of 1.12. NOTE: +/- 1.8 points is implausibly tight for n=1,021 (roughly +/- 3.2 would be expected at DEFF 1.12); the figure is recorded exactly as Ipsos published it and should be treated as a probable error in the source document.
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Nationally representative probability sample of adults 18+ (N=1,021) PLUS an LGBT boost sample (N=285), for a combined total of 1,306. IMPORTANT: the topline tables for the items below print '(N=1,306)', i.e. the combined base including the boost. Ipsos weighted the general-population sample and the LGBT boost separately, each raked to the 18+ adult population, but the release does not state how the two were combined for the published totals. Percentages on the contact and gender-belief items should therefore NOT be read as clean general-population estimates.

Wording notes: 27% answered 'Not sure' - more than double the trans item's 12%, suggesting many respondents did not know what the category meantpublished base appears to include the LGBT boost sample
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes, I am
  • Yes, in my immediate family
  • Yes, in my extended family
  • Yes, a friend
  • Yes, a coworker
  • Yes, a neighbor
  • Yes, an acquaintance
  • No
  • Not sure
  • Refused
IpsosIdentity beliefsdata flagOct 4–7, 2019
belief that gender is strictly binary

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements. - A person is either a man or a woman and not anything in between

Agree 41%35% Disagree
Sample
1,306 adults; includes an LGBT boost sample · As published: 'plus or minus 1.8 percentage points at the 95% confidence level' for the general-population sample of adults, with a stated design effect of 1.12. NOTE: +/- 1.8 points is implausibly tight for n=1,021 (roughly +/- 3.2 would be expected at DEFF 1.12); the figure is recorded exactly as Ipsos published it and should be treated as a probable error in the source document.
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Nationally representative probability sample of adults 18+ (N=1,021) PLUS an LGBT boost sample (N=285), for a combined total of 1,306. IMPORTANT: the topline tables for the items below print '(N=1,306)', i.e. the combined base including the boost. Ipsos weighted the general-population sample and the LGBT boost separately, each raked to the 18+ adult population, but the release does not state how the two were combined for the published totals. Percentages on the contact and gender-belief items should therefore NOT be read as clean general-population estimates.

Wording notes: offers a true midpoint ('Neither agree nor disagree') plus a separate 'Don't know', which most binary-belief items do not - 23% took one of the twofielded alongside its near-converse ('There is a spectrum of gender identities'), which is a useful internal consistency checkpublished base appears to include the LGBT boost sample
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Neither agree nor disagree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Don't know
  • Refused
IpsosIdentity beliefsdata flagOct 4–7, 2019
belief that gender is defined by natal reproductive organs

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements. - Gender is defined by the reproductive organs you are born with

Agree 50%28% Disagree
Sample
1,306 adults; includes an LGBT boost sample · As published: 'plus or minus 1.8 percentage points at the 95% confidence level' for the general-population sample of adults, with a stated design effect of 1.12. NOTE: +/- 1.8 points is implausibly tight for n=1,021 (roughly +/- 3.2 would be expected at DEFF 1.12); the figure is recorded exactly as Ipsos published it and should be treated as a probable error in the source document.
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Nationally representative probability sample of adults 18+ (N=1,021) PLUS an LGBT boost sample (N=285), for a combined total of 1,306. IMPORTANT: the topline tables for the items below print '(N=1,306)', i.e. the combined base including the boost. Ipsos weighted the general-population sample and the LGBT boost separately, each raked to the 18+ adult population, but the release does not state how the two were combined for the published totals. Percentages on the contact and gender-belief items should therefore NOT be read as clean general-population estimates.

Wording notes: 'reproductive organs' is a narrower and more concrete criterion than 'sex assigned at birth', and narrower than chromosomes - respondents are answering about anatomy specificallyconflates sex and gender in the premise, which is precisely the proposition at issuepublished base appears to include the LGBT boost sample
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Neither agree nor disagree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Don't know
  • Refused
IpsosIdentity beliefsdata flagOct 4–7, 2019
belief that gender identity exists on a spectrum

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements. - There is a spectrum of gender identities

Agree 45%24% Disagree
Sample
1,306 adults; includes an LGBT boost sample · As published: 'plus or minus 1.8 percentage points at the 95% confidence level' for the general-population sample of adults, with a stated design effect of 1.12. NOTE: +/- 1.8 points is implausibly tight for n=1,021 (roughly +/- 3.2 would be expected at DEFF 1.12); the figure is recorded exactly as Ipsos published it and should be treated as a probable error in the source document.
Method
probability panel
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Nationally representative probability sample of adults 18+ (N=1,021) PLUS an LGBT boost sample (N=285), for a combined total of 1,306. IMPORTANT: the topline tables for the items below print '(N=1,306)', i.e. the combined base including the boost. Ipsos weighted the general-population sample and the LGBT boost separately, each raked to the 18+ adult population, but the release does not state how the two were combined for the published totals. Percentages on the contact and gender-belief items should therefore NOT be read as clean general-population estimates.

Wording notes: 10% chose 'Don't know', the highest of the battery - 'spectrum of gender identities' was still unfamiliar language in 2019the affirming counterpart to the binary and reproductive-organs itemspublished base appears to include the LGBT boost sample
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Neither agree nor disagree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Don't know
  • Refused
Morning ConsultSportsJul 19–21, 2019
whether trans women athletes have a competitive advantage over cis women

As you may know, a transgender woman is a person who was assigned the male sex at birth who identifies as female.

As you may know, a transgender woman is a person who was assigned the male sex at birth who identifies as female.Generally speaking, do you agree or disagree that transgender female athletes have a competitive advantage over non-transgender (aka cisgendered) female athletes?

Agree 57%20% Disagree
Sample
2,200 adults · plus or minus 2 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 15 subgroup figures

Base: Split-half design: the transgender-women items (TIS2, TIS4) were asked of n=1114 and the transgender-men items (TIS3, TIS5) of n=1086. TIS6 was asked of the full 2200.

Wording notes: supplies a definitional preamble that frames trans status in terms of sex assigned at birth'competitive advantage' is asserted as the proposition to be agreed with, an agree/disagree format prone to acquiescenceglosses cisgender as 'non-transgender (aka cisgendered)'no hormone-therapy, age or eligibility-rule qualifier is offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Don't know / No opinion
Morning ConsultSportsJul 19–21, 2019
whether trans men athletes have a competitive advantage over cis men

As you may know, a transgender man is a person who was assigned as female at birth who identifies as male.

As you may know, a transgender man is a person who was assigned as female at birth who identifies as male.Generally speaking, do you agree or disagree that transgender male athletes have a competitive advantage over non-transgender (aka cisgendered) male athletes?

Agree 28%39% Disagree
Sample
2,200 adults · plus or minus 2 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 15 subgroup figures

Base: Split-half design: the transgender-women items (TIS2, TIS4) were asked of n=1114 and the transgender-men items (TIS3, TIS5) of n=1086. TIS6 was asked of the full 2200.

Wording notes: supplies a definitional preamble that frames trans status in terms of sex assigned at birth'competitive advantage' is asserted as the proposition to be agreed with, an agree/disagree format prone to acquiescenceglosses cisgender as 'non-transgender (aka cisgendered)'no hormone-therapy, age or eligibility-rule qualifier is offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Strongly agree
  • Somewhat agree
  • Somewhat disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Don't know / No opinion
Morning ConsultContact & populationJul 19–21, 2019
knowing a transgender or nonbinary person

As you may know, a transgender person is someone who identifies with a different gender than the one they were assigned at birth. A nonbinary person, also known as genderqueer, does not identify as exclusively masculine or feminine, but expresses multiple genders at the same time.

As you may know, a transgender person is someone who identifies with a different gender than the one they were assigned at birth. A nonbinary person, also known as genderqueer, does not identify as exclusively masculine or feminine, but expresses multiple genders at the same time. Do you know any transgender or nonbinary individuals?

No
60%
Yes
28%
Don't know / No opinion
12%
Sample
2,200 adults · plus or minus 2 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 9 subgroup figures

Base: Split-half design: the transgender-women items (TIS2, TIS4) were asked of n=1114 and the transgender-men items (TIS3, TIS5) of n=1086. TIS6 was asked of the full 2200.

Wording notes: supplies definitions before asking, which may raise reported contactbundles transgender and nonbinary acquaintance into one measureunlike the 2021 version of this item, a don't-know option is offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't know / No opinion
Morning ConsultSportsparaphrasedJul 19–21, 2019
belief that transgender women have a competitive advantage over cisgender women

Transgender female athletes have a competitive advantage over cisgender female athletes

Agree 57%20% Disagree
Sample
2,200 adults · plus or minus 2 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Split-half design: the transgender-women items (TIS2, TIS4) were asked of n=1114 and the transgender-men items (TIS3, TIS5) of n=1086. TIS6 was asked of the full 2200.

Wording notes: uses 'cisgender', unusual for mass-public pollingasserts a contested empirical claim for agreement
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Morning ConsultSportsparaphrasedJul 19–21, 2019
belief that transgender men have a competitive advantage over cisgender men

Transgender male athletes have a competitive advantage over cisgender male athletes

Agree 28%39% Disagree
Sample
2,200 adults · plus or minus 2 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Split-half design: the transgender-women items (TIS2, TIS4) were asked of n=1114 and the transgender-men items (TIS3, TIS5) of n=1086. TIS6 was asked of the full 2200.

Wording notes: mirror-image split-half of the trans women item
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Morning ConsultIdentity beliefsJul 19–21, 2019
belief that men are physically stronger and faster than women

men are physically stronger and faster than women

Agree
65%
Sample
2,200 adults · plus or minus 2 percentage points
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 1 subgroup figure

Base: Split-half design: the transgender-women items (TIS2, TIS4) were asked of n=1114 and the transgender-men items (TIS3, TIS5) of n=1086. TIS6 was asked of the full 2200.

Wording notes: a general sex-difference belief item used by Morning Consult to explain the athlete itemsagree/disagree single statement, subject to acquiescence bias
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Research Co.Bathrooms & facilitiesJul 15–17, 2019
public bathroom use by transgender Canadians

As you may know, there have been some discussions across Canada on establishing policies for the use of public bathrooms by transgender Canadians. From what you have seen, read or heard, do you think transgender Canadians should be allowed to use the public bathroom of their choice or use the public bathroom based on biological sex?

Definitely/probably use the public bathroom of their choice
52%
Definitely/probably use the public bathroom based on biological sex
33%
Not sure
16%
Sample
1,000 adults · ±3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty
Method
online opt-in
Where
Canada national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures

Base: Party breaks are 2015 federal election vote.

Wording notes: uses 'biological sex' as the counterpoint to 'choice'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Definitely use the public bathroom based on biological sex
  • Probably use the public bathroom based on biological sex
  • Probably use the public bathroom of their choice
  • Definitely use the public bathroom of their choice
  • Not sure
Harvard CAPS/HarrisBathrooms & facilitiesMay 29–30, 2019
workplace restroom policy for trans employees

How should workplaces deal with trans-gender and gender-neutral employees when it comes to the use of restrooms?

Provide gender-neutral restrooms
43%
Do nothing. This is not an issue for employers to solve
35%
Allow trans-gender and gender-neutral employees choose the restroom associate with
22%
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: response option text is garbled in the published topline ('choose the restroom associate with')no 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Allow trans-gender and gender-neutral employees choose the restroom associate with
  • Provide gender-neutral restrooms
  • Do nothing. This is not an issue for employers to solve
Harvard CAPS/HarrisBathrooms & facilitiesMay 29–30, 2019
birth-sex vs gender-identity restroom use

Do you think that transgender people should be required to use the bathroom of their sex at birth or allowed to use the bathroom that best aligns with their gender identity and stated sex?

Use the bathroom of their sex at birth
50%
Use the bathroom that best aligns with their stated sex
50%
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: no 'not sure' optionuses 'sex at birth' and 'stated sex' symmetrically
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Use the bathroom of their sex at birth
  • Use the bathroom that best aligns with their stated sex
Harvard CAPS/HarrisBathrooms & facilitiesMay 29–30, 2019
constitutional right to bathroom of stated sex

Would you favor the Supreme Court finding that transgender people have a constitutional right to use the bathroom of their stated sex or oppose such a finding?

Favor 52%48% Oppose
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: no 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
Harvard CAPS/HarrisBathrooms & facilitiesMay 29–30, 2019
whether birth-sex bathroom laws are discriminatory

In general, do you think laws that require transgender people to use the bathroom of their sex at birth are discriminatory to them or not?

Not discriminatory
56%
Discriminatory
44%
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: no 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Discriminatory
  • Not discriminatory
Harvard CAPS/HarrisBathrooms & facilitiesMay 29–30, 2019
law requiring birth-sex bathroom use

Do you favor or oppose a law to require public institutions and accommodations to require transgender people to use bathrooms of their sex at birth?

Favor 50%50% Oppose
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: no 'not sure' optionpaired split-half style with GC0508, which asks the mirror-image policy
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
Harvard CAPS/HarrisBathrooms & facilitiesMay 29–30, 2019
law allowing gender-identity bathroom use

Do you favor or oppose a law to require public institutions and accommodations to allow transgender people to use bathrooms that best aligns with their gender identity and stated sex?

Favor 54%46% Oppose
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: no 'not sure' optionmirror image of GC0507 asked of the same respondents
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
Harvard CAPS/HarrisBathrooms & facilitiesMay 29–30, 2019
which body should decide bathroom policy

Do you think the issue of public bathroom use by transgender people should be decided by each state, by Congress or the Supreme Court?

Supreme Court
45%
State
34%
Congress
20%
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: no 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • State
  • Congress
  • Supreme Court
Harvard CAPS/HarrisMilitary serviceMay 29–30, 2019
trans military service

Do you favor or oppose allowing transgender to serve in the military?

Favor 68%32% Oppose
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: grammatically truncated - 'allowing transgender to serve' omits the noun ('transgender people'), a published wording errorno 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Favor
  • Oppose
Harvard CAPS/HarrisLegal documents & IDsMay 29–30, 2019
self-specified gender in government and school treatment

Do you think that in general people should be able to specify their gender identity and stated sex to be used in how people are treated by the government and public institutions like schools or should stated sex not be used?

Should be able to specify their stated sex
51%
Stated sex should not be used
49%
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: convoluted double-clause stemno 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Should be able to specify their stated sex
  • Stated sex should not be used
Harvard CAPS/HarrisSportsMay 29–30, 2019
high school and college team eligibility

Should competitive athletic teams in high schools and college allow transgender to play on the team of their stated sex or require them to play on the teams of their birth sex?

Require them to play on the teams of their birth sex
51%
Allow to play on the team of their stated sex
49%
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: grammatically truncated ('allow transgender to play')no 'not sure' option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Allow to play on the team of their stated sex
  • Require them to play on the teams of their birth sex
Harvard CAPS/HarrisSportsMay 29–30, 2019
gender-neutral sports

Should we make all sports gender-neutral, allowing athletes of both sexes to compete with one another as they chose?

No
47%
Yes
29%
Unsure/ Don't Know
24%
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: one-sided stem ('Should we make...') with no stated alternativetypo 'as they chose'
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unsure/ Don't Know
Harvard CAPS/HarrisSportsMay 29–30, 2019
fairness of competing against trans athletes

Do you consider it fair or unfair for athletes of one sex to compete against gender-neutral or trans-gender athletes who were born as members of the either sex?

Unfair
45%
Fair
23%
Unsure / Don't Know
32%
Sample
1,295 registered voters · not disclosed
Method
online opt-in
Where
US national
Source
Pollster release(opens another site)
Full record

Base: Unweighted base 1,295; weighted base 1,328 (topline is filtered on registered voters but weighted to the U.S. general adult population)

Wording notes: garbled stem ('who were born as members of the either sex')conflates 'gender-neutral' and 'trans-gender' athletes
Response options as the pollster wrote them
  • Fair
  • Unfair
  • Unsure / Don't Know

Figures transcribed from public sources; each links to the original release. How to read this data →