Every question, with its verbatim wording, its toplines, and a link to the pollster’s own release. Filters combine; the
address updates so any view can be shared.
Marist Pollfor WGBH BostonBathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedMay 12–14, 2016equal rights for transgender people in public restrooms
While nearly two-thirds of residents, 64%, report transgender people should have equal rights in this area, 27% do not think they should receive equal protection under the law when it comes to public restrooms.
Should have equal rights in public restrooms
64%
Should not receive equal protection under the law in public restrooms
27%
- Sample
- 507 adults · ±4.4 percentage points; the error margin was not adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations
- Method
- probability RDD
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record · 3 subgroup figures
Base: 86% of the sample were national registered voters; banner crosstabs are reported for adults
Wording notes: abstract 'equal rights' framing rather than a concrete access rule
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Should have equal rights in public restrooms
- Should not
Marist Pollfor WGBH BostonBathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedMay 12–14, 2016 whether public restrooms should be sex-separated or gender neutral
On the question of whether public restrooms should be gender neutral, six in ten Americans, 60%, think restrooms should be separated as male and female and should not be gender neutral. 31% say public bathrooms should be gender neutral for anyone to use.
Base: 86% of the sample were national registered voters; banner crosstabs are reported for adults
Wording notes: does not mention transgender people in the stem
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Separated as male and female, not gender neutral
- Gender neutral for anyone to use
Marist Pollfor WGBH BostonBathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedMay 12–14, 2016 whether transgender people may choose the restroom matching their identity
Should transgender and gender fluid individuals be allowed to choose the public restroom with which they identify? Americans divide. 43% report individuals should be allowed to make that decision while 44% say transgender people should use the bathroom that correlates with the sex on his or her birth certificate.
Should use the bathroom matching the sex on their birth certificate
44%
Should be allowed to choose the restroom with which they identify
43%
- Sample
- 507 adults · ±4.4 percentage points; the error margin was not adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations
- Method
- probability RDD
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record · 7 subgroup figures
Base: 86% of the sample were national registered voters; banner crosstabs are reported for adults
Wording notes: concrete access rule stated on both sides
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Should be allowed to choose the public restroom with which they identify
- Should use the bathroom that correlates with the sex on his or her birth certificate
Marist Pollfor WGBH BostonContact & populationparaphrasedMay 12–14, 2016 knowing a transgender or gender fluid person
Close to six in ten Americans, 59%, say they do not know someone who is transgender or gender fluid. A notable 39% of the American public say they do.
No
59%
Yes, know someone who is transgender or gender fluid
39%
- Sample
- 507 adults · ±4.4 percentage points; the error margin was not adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations
- Method
- probability RDD
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record
Base: 86% of the sample were national registered voters; banner crosstabs are reported for adults
Wording notes: combines 'transgender' and 'gender fluid' into one screen
Response options as the pollster wrote them
GallupBathrooms & facilitiesMay 4–8, 2016public restroom policy - birth gender vs. gender identity
In terms of policies governing public restrooms, do you think these policies should -- [ROTATED: require transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their birth gender (or should these policies) allow transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their gender identity]?
Wording notes: uses 'birth gender'no middle option offeredresponse order rotated
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Require transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their birth gender
- Allow transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their gender identity
- No opinion
Suffolk Universityfor The Boston GlobeNondiscriminationdata flagMay 2–5, 2016support for the pending Massachusetts gender-identity public accommodations bill (SB 2407)
Currently, there are public accommodations bills before the Massachusetts legislature that protect the civil rights of transgender people, including their right to use the restroom that conforms to their gender identity. Do you support or oppose passage of such a bill?
Wording notes: explicitly frames the bill as a civil-rights protectionexplicitly names restroom access
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Support
- Oppose
- Undecided
- Refused
GallupBathrooms & facilitiesMay 2016 public restroom policy - birth gender vs gender identity
In terms of policies governing public restrooms, do you think these policies should -- [ROTATED: require transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their birth gender (or should these policies) allow transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their gender identity]?
Wording notes: uses 'birth gender'response order rotatedno middle option offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Require transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their birth gender
- Allow transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their gender identity
- No opinion
GallupBathrooms & facilitiesMay 2016 – May 31, 2016 public restroom policy: birth gender vs. gender identity
In terms of policies governing public restrooms, do you think these policies should -- [ROTATED: require transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their birth gender (or should these policies) allow transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their gender identity]?
Wording notes: uses 'birth gender'uses 'transgender individuals', not 'biological males'alternatives explicitly ROTATEDrestrooms only - locker rooms not namedno middle option offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Require transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their birth gender
- Allow transgender individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their gender identity
- No opinion
CNNfor CNNBathrooms & facilitiesApr 28, 2016 – May 2016laws requiring facility use matching gender at birth
Overall, would you say you favor or oppose laws that require transgender individuals to use facilities that correspond to their gender at birth rather than their gender identity?
Base: 601 landline and 400 cell phone interviews; the sample also includes 890 registered voters (+/- 3.5 points)
Wording notes: uses 'gender at birth' contrasted with 'gender identity'asks about the restrictive law rather than about access
Response options as the pollster wrote them
CNNfor CNNNondiscriminationApr 28, 2016 – May 2016 equal-protection laws for transgender people in jobs, housing, public accommodations
Overall, do you favor or oppose laws that guarantee equal protection for transgender people in jobs, housing and public accommodations?
Base: 601 landline and 400 cell phone interviews; the sample also includes 890 registered voters (+/- 3.5 points)
Wording notes: 'guarantee equal protection' is a positively valenced framing
Response options as the pollster wrote them
CNNfor CNNContact & populationApr 28, 2016 – May 2016 knowing a transgender family member or close friend
Do you happen to have a family member or close friend who is transgender?
Base: 601 landline and 400 cell phone interviews; the sample also includes 890 registered voters (+/- 3.5 points)
Wording notes: restricts to family member or close friend, excluding coworkers and acquaintances
Response options as the pollster wrote them
OIORC Internationalfor CNNBathrooms & facilitiesApr 28, 2016 – May 2016
laws requiring facility use by gender at birth (HB2-type laws)
Overall, would you say you favor or oppose laws that require transgender individuals to use facilities that correspond to their gender at birth rather than their gender identity?
Wording notes: uses 'gender at birth' rather than 'sex at birth'uses 'facilities', not 'restrooms' - broader than the Gallup itemasks about the law/requirement rather than about the underlying behavior'require ... rather than' construction puts the restrictive option in the active voiceno middle option offered
Response options as the pollster wrote them
SurveyUSAfor KSTP-TV (Minneapolis)Bathrooms & facilitiesApr 28, 2016 – May 2, 2016laws requiring restroom use to match the gender on a person's birth certificate
Some states are considering laws that require individuals to use the restroom that matches the gender listed on their birth certificate and not the gender with which they identify. How do you feel about laws requiring people to follow their birth certificate in using a restroom? Do you strongly agree? Somewhat agree? Neither agree or disagree? Somewhat disagree? or strongly disagree?
Base: SurveyUSA's own PDF mislabels the base row for questions 2 and 3 as '500 Current And Former Catholics'; the composition rows for those questions are identical to question 1's '500 Adults' base, so the base is the same 500 Minnesota adults. This is a template artefact in the released document, noted here rather than corrected.
Wording notes: offers an explicit middle 'neither' optionasks about agreement with the restrictive law rather than about transgender people directly
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly Agree
- Somewhat Agree
- Neither
- Somewhat Disagree
- Strongly Disagree
- Not Sure
SurveyUSAfor KSTP-TV (Minneapolis)SportsApr 28, 2016 – May 2, 2016 transgender high school athletes required to play on birth-certificate teams
Should transgender student athletes participating in high school sports be required to play on teams following the gender listed on their birth certificate?
Base: SurveyUSA's own PDF mislabels the base row for questions 2 and 3 as '500 Current And Former Catholics'; the composition rows for those questions are identical to question 1's '500 Adults' base, so the base is the same 500 Minnesota adults. This is a template artefact in the released document, noted here rather than corrected.
Wording notes: yes/no with no stated alternative policyunusually large 'not sure' share (27%)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Elon University PollBathrooms & facilitiesApr 10–15, 2016state preemption of local ordinances allowing transgender people to use facilities matching gender identity (HB2)
Recently the city of Charlotte passed an ordinance allowing transgender individuals to use public facilities, such as bathrooms, that best match their gender identity. The state then passed a law prohibiting such local ordinances. In terms of governmental authority, should cities be allowed to adopt such policies or should the state government ban such ordinances?
Base: 621 registered voters out of 692 total respondents
Wording notes: framed as a question of governmental authority (state vs. city) rather than of transgender access itselfsupplies factual preamble naming Charlotte and the state law
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- State should prohibit cities from passing such ordinances
- Cities should be allowed to pass such policies
- Don't know
SurveyUSAfor WRAL NewsBathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedApr 8–11, 2016 overall approval of HB2
[Paraphrase - approve or disapprove of HB2]
Wording notes: administered wording unknown
Response options as the pollster wrote them
SurveyUSAfor WRAL NewsBathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedApr 8–11, 2016 agreement that bathroom use should follow the birth certificate
[Paraphrase - agree or disagree that transgender people should use the bathroom that matches the gender listed on their birth certificates, asked on a strongly/somewhat scale]
Wording notes: administered wording unknownagree/disagree format is vulnerable to acquiescence bias
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
SurveyUSAfor WRAL NewsBathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedApr 8–11, 2016 what should happen to HB2
[Paraphrase - whether the law should be repealed completely, kept only in its bathroom provision, changed in other ways, or left as is]
Repeal the law completely
37%
Let only the bathroom provision remain
20%
Make other changes
19%
Leave the law as is
18%
- Sample
- 779 registered voters · ±3.6 percentage points
- Method
- unknown
- Where
- US: North Carolina
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: administered wording unknownfour-way option set splits the pro-retention side across three answers
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Repeal the law completely
- Let only the bathroom provision remain
- Make other changes
- Leave the law as is
YouGovBathrooms & facilitiesMar 26–28, 2016which bathrooms transgender people should use
Do you think transgender people should use the bathrooms that correspond with their birth gender or with their current gender?
Wording notes: 'birth gender' vs 'current gender' contrastno policy framing - asks about behavior rather than lawhigh not-sure share (26%)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Birth gender
- Current gender
- Not sure
YouGovBathrooms & facilitiesMar 26–28, 2016 a law requiring transgender people to use the bathroom matching their birth gender
Do you favor or oppose a law that would require transgender people to use the bathroom which corresponds with the gender of their birth?
Wording notes: favor = restriction, inverting the usual directionpaired with Q7 as a behavior-vs-law comparison on the same sample
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Favor strongly
- Favor somewhat
- Oppose somewhat
- Oppose strongly
- Not sure
YouGovBathrooms & facilitiesMar 26–28, 2016 state preemption of local bathroom ordinances
Do you think that cities and municipalities should be able to make their own laws about who can use which bathrooms, or should there be one law for the entire state?
There should be one law for the entire state
70%
Cities and municipalities should be able to make their own laws
16%
Not sure
14%
- Sample
- 1,000 adults · ± 4% (adjusted for weighting)
- Method
- online opt-in
- Where
- US national
- Source
- Pollster release↗(opens another site)
Full record
Wording notes: does not name transgender people explicitly - euphemised as 'who can use which bathrooms'asked directly after a parallel preemption item about anti-gay employment discrimination, so the referent is established by context
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Cities and municipalities should be able to make their own laws
- There should be one law for the entire state
- Not sure
YouGovGeneral acceptanceMar 26–28, 2016 belief that transgender people are more likely to sexually assault women and children
Do you think that transgender people are more or less likely than other people to sexually assault women and children?
Wording notes: directly measures the predator stereotype that anchored the 2016 bathroom-bill campaignasks respondents to compare transgender people to 'other people' on propensity to commit sexual assault - a social-distance/stigma item rather than a policy itemoffers a 'less likely' pole that has no natural constituency, which may compress the distribution
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- More likely
- About as likely
- Less likely
- Not sure
Gallupfor Healthways (Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index)Contact & populationJan 2016 – Dec 31, 2016 combined LGBT self-identification (transgender not broken out)
Do you, personally, identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender?
Wording notes: single yes/no collapses four distinct identities
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Yes
- No
- Don't know / refused
BRBellwether Research & Consultingfor Indianapolis Chamber of CommerceNondiscriminationparaphraseddata flagDec 2–9, 2015
adding sexual orientation and gender identity to Indiana's protected classes
[Paraphrase from news write-up; instrument not published] Do you support or oppose making it illegal to discriminate against LGBT citizens - that is, adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the seven protected classes in Indiana's existing civil rights laws?
Wording notes: exact wording not publishedsupport side and oppose side described under two different framings in the source
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly support
- Somewhat support
- Somewhat oppose
- Strongly oppose
K1KHOU 11 News / News 88.7NondiscriminationparaphrasedDec 2015
support for a Houston nondiscrimination ordinance with gender identity removed
[Paraphrase - as described by the pollster: whether the respondent would still support or oppose the ordinance if they knew that sexual identity, as opposed to sexual orientation, would no longer be a protected right]
Wording notes: uses 'sexual identity' rather than 'gender identity'hypothetical-revision design: asks about a version of the ordinance that did not exist
Response options as the pollster wrote them
PRRINondiscriminationdata flagDec 2015 – Dec 31, 2015LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)
Q12. Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.
Base: Monthly AVA wave. PRRI publishes only the pooled annual AVA sample size and margin of error; per-wave n and MOE are not disclosed in the topline.
Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one itemthree policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
PSPrinceton Survey Research Associates Internationalfor Ball State University; Gannett Co. / The Indianapolis StarNondiscriminationparaphrasedDec 2015
expanding Indiana civil rights law to cover sexual orientation and gender identity
[Paraphrase from news write-up; instrument not published] Do you favor or oppose expanding the state civil rights law to include sexual orientation and gender identity?
Wording notes: uses the abstract phrase 'civil rights'exact wording not published
Response options as the pollster wrote them
SRSurvey Research Centerfor News 88.7 / KHOU 11 NewsNondiscriminationDec 2015 – Dec 9, 2015
support for a hypothetical replacement HERO with gender identity removed
Would you support Houston Equal Rights Ordinance that would prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, race, national origin, age, military status, religion or disability, but would not include gender identity - that is not allow men who identify and dress as a woman to use a women's restroom?
Base: Registered voters in the City of Houston who voted in the November 2015 city election and who had already voted in, or were certain or very likely to vote in, the December 12 runoff.
Wording notes: equates removing gender identity with a restroom ruleopponent-side characterization of trans womenasks about a hypothetical ordinance that did not exist
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- For
- Against
- Don't Know
- Refused
SRSurvey Research Centerfor News 88.7 / KHOU 11 NewsNondiscriminationDec 2015 – Dec 9, 2015
recalled vote on Houston Proposition 1 (HERO), November 3 2015
How did you vote on the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance? Did you vote for or against the Equal Rights Ordinance that would prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, race, national origin, age, military status, religion, or disability?
Base: Registered voters in the City of Houston who voted in the November 2015 city election and who had already voted in, or were certain or very likely to vote in, the December 12 runoff.
Wording notes: retrospective vote recall, subject to the usual over-report of the winning side
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- For
- Against
- Don't Know
- Refused
PRRINondiscriminationdata flagNov 2015 – Nov 30, 2015 LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)
Q12. Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.
Base: Monthly AVA wave. PRRI publishes only the pooled annual AVA sample size and margin of error; per-wave n and MOE are not disclosed in the topline.
Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one itemthree policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
HPHarris Pollfor GLAADGeneral acceptanceparaphrasedOct 5–7, 2015
whether acts of violence against transgender people are a serious problem
[Chart caption, wording as published: 'Perception of LGBT problems by non-LGBT Americans (total % of non-LGBT respondents who stated that the following problems were not serious; strongest responses of disbelief highlighted)' - item: 'Acts of violence against transgender people']
Base: 1,781 of the 2,032 adults were classified as non-LGBT; the published toplines below are the non-LGBT subsample
Wording notes: only the 'not serious' side of the scale is published, so the full distribution cannot be reconstructedreported for the non-LGBT subsample only
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Not serious (net)
- Not at all serious
HPHarris Pollfor GLAADGeneral acceptanceOct 5–7, 2015
whether anti-transgender violence is a serious problem
Perception of LGBT problems by non-LGBT Americans
Acts of violence against transgender people
Base: 1,781 of the 2,032 adults were classified as non-LGBT; the published toplines below are the non-LGBT subsample
Wording notes: only the 'not serious' side of the scale was published; the 'serious' percentages were not releasedbattery stem not printed
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- not serious (net)
- not at all serious
K1KHOU 11 News / KUHF News 88.7NondiscriminationparaphrasedOct 2015
vote intention on the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (Proposition 1)
[Paraphrase - support or oppose the Houston equal rights ordinance]
Base: the restroom follow-up was asked only of respondents who said they supported the ordinance; the NFL/NCAA follow-up only of opponents
Wording notes: administered wording unknown - it is not recoverable whether the ballot language listing gender identity was read
Response options as the pollster wrote them
K1KHOU 11 News / KUHF News 88.7Bathrooms & facilitiesparaphrasedOct 2015
whether the restroom argument would move ordinance supporters
[Paraphrase - asked of supporters: whether they would change their support if they knew a man who identifies and dresses as a woman could use a woman's restroom under the law]
Base: the restroom follow-up was asked only of respondents who said they supported the ordinance; the NFL/NCAA follow-up only of opponents
Wording notes: as reported, the probe describes a trans woman as 'a man who identifies and dresses as a woman'argument-testing design: presents only the opposition's frame to supporters
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Would not change support
- Could not support the ordinance
- Unsure
PRRINondiscriminationdata flagOct 2015 – Oct 31, 2015 LGBT nondiscrimination protections in jobs, public accommodations and housing (item explicitly names transgender people)
Q12. Do you favor or oppose each of the following?
Laws that would protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing.
Base: Monthly AVA wave. PRRI publishes only the pooled annual AVA sample size and margin of error; per-wave n and MOE are not disclosed in the topline.
Wording notes: bundles transgender people with gay, lesbian and bisexual people in one itemthree policy domains combined in one question (jobs, public accommodations, housing)
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Strongly favor
- Favor
- Oppose
- Strongly oppose
- Skipped/Refused
SRSurvey Research Centerfor News 88.7 / KHOU 11 NewsNondiscriminationSep 25, 2015 – Oct 6, 2015
favor/oppose the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance (HERO) as passed
Do you favor or oppose the Equal Rights Ordinance passed by the Houston City Council that would prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, race, national origin, age, military status, religion or disability?
Base: Registered voters in the City of Houston who reported they were either 'certain' or 'very likely' to vote in November 2015. The frame combined N=464 voters who had voted in two of the last three City of Houston municipal elections (2009, 2011, 2013) with N=103 registered voters who had not. HERO items are reported on a base of 565.
Wording notes: lists gender identity inside a multi-class enumeration rather than singling it outdoes not mention restrooms
Response options as the pollster wrote them
SRSurvey Research Centerfor News 88.7 / KHOU 11 NewsBathrooms & facilitiesSep 25, 2015 – Oct 6, 2015
persuasion probe: would HERO supporters still support it given the restroom argument
Would you still support the City of Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance if you knew that the ordinance allows a man who identifies and dresses as a woman to use a woman's restrooms?
Base: Registered voters in the City of Houston who reported they were either 'certain' or 'very likely' to vote in November 2015. The frame combined N=464 voters who had voted in two of the last three City of Houston municipal elections (2009, 2011, 2013) with N=103 registered voters who had not. HERO items are reported on a base of 565.
Wording notes: opponent-side framing adopted as fact ('allows a man who identifies and dresses as a woman')asked only of prior supportersone-sided probe with no matching counter-argument in the same item
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Support
- Oppose
- Unsure
- Refused
SRSurvey Research Centerfor News 88.7 / KHOU 11 NewsBathrooms & facilitiesSep 25, 2015 – Oct 6, 2015
persuasion probe: $5,000 business fine framing
Would you still support the City of Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance if you knew that restaurants and any business open to the public can be fined $5,000 for refusing to allow a man who identifies and dresses as a woman to use the woman's restroom?
Base: Registered voters in the City of Houston who reported they were either 'certain' or 'very likely' to vote in November 2015. The frame combined N=464 voters who had voted in two of the last three City of Houston municipal elections (2009, 2011, 2013) with N=103 registered voters who had not. HERO items are reported on a base of 565.
Wording notes: opponent-side framing adopted as factmonetary penalty stated as certainasked only of prior supporters
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Support
- Oppose
- Unsure
- Refused
SRSurvey Research Centerfor News 88.7 / KHOU 11 NewsNondiscriminationSep 25, 2015 – Oct 6, 2015
persuasion probe: would HERO opponents still oppose given Super Bowl / Final Four withdrawal
Would you still oppose the City of Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance if you knew that the National Football League would withdraw the 2017 Super Bowl in Houston and the National College Athletic Association would withdraw playing the Final Four Basketball Tournament in Houston if the voters of Houston repealed the City's Equal Right Ordinance?
Base: Registered voters in the City of Houston who reported they were either 'certain' or 'very likely' to vote in November 2015. The frame combined N=464 voters who had voted in two of the last three City of Houston municipal elections (2009, 2011, 2013) with N=103 registered voters who had not. HERO items are reported on a base of 565.
Wording notes: supporter-side economic threat stated as certainasked only of prior opponentsmirror image of the restroom probe put to supporters
Response options as the pollster wrote them
Lifeway Researchfor LifeWay Christian Resources (Southern Baptist Convention)General acceptanceparaphrasedSep 14–28, 2015morality of identifying with a gender different from birth sex
It is morally wrong to identify with a gender different from the gender one was born with. [Agree / Disagree / It's not a moral issue]
Wording notes: morality framingoffers an explicit not-a-moral-issue escape option
Response options as the pollster wrote them
- Agree (morally wrong)
- Disagree
- It's not a moral issue
- Not sure